FOCL Practice Test

What type of evidence can be destroyed to hinder a police investigation?

1. Physical Evidence

2. Documentary Evidence

3. Tampering with Evidence

4. Circumstantial Evidence

The correct answer is: Tampering with Evidence

Tampering with evidence refers specifically to actions taken to alter, destroy, or conceal evidence that could be critical to a police investigation. This is a deliberate act intended to mislead law enforcement or obstruct justice. When evidence is tampered with, it can severely impede the investigative process, as it can prevent investigators from accurately reconstructing a crime scene or understanding the facts surrounding the incident. Physical evidence consists of tangible items that can be collected and analyzed, such as DNA, fingerprints, or weapons, and while these items can be destroyed, the broader category of tampering specifically implies intentional interference. Documentary evidence refers to written materials, such as contracts, emails, or records, which can also be destroyed or altered, but again, tampering focuses more on the intent to undermine an investigation. Circumstantial evidence relies on inferences and indirect evidence, and while it can be undermined through deceit, the action of destroying evidence is explicitly categorized under tampering, highlighting the intentional wrongdoing involved in hindering an investigation.